Arrhythmias & electrophysiology

Figure-of-8 Suture With a 3-Way Tap Versus Manual Compression After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: The HARNESS Randomized Controlled Trial

JACC Clin ElectrophysiolPublished randomized controlled trial

Authors' conclusion

After AF catheter ablation, Fo8TAP was superior to MC in lowering the incidence of access site complications and was associated with health care efficiencies. However, a 2-hour bed rest strategy failed to meet noninferiority criteria versus 4 hours. (Haemostasis After Venous Access in Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation [HARNESS]; NCT06470555).

Study context

Population
Patients undergoing atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation via unilateral femoral venous accessenrolled and randomized
Participants
336 patients
Comparison
Superiority and noninferiority
  • MC-4n = 110
  • TAP-4n = 110
  • TAP-2n = 116
Primary endpoint
any access site complication
Follow-up
Before hospital discharge

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

TAP-4 vs MC-4: P = 0.002 · TAP-2 vs TAP-4: P = 0.156

Secondary outcomes

Median time to hemostasis

Median time to catheter laboratory exit

Median time to mobilization

  • Median time to hemostasis: P < 0.001
  • Median time to catheter laboratory exit: P < 0.001
  • Median time to mobilization: P < 0.001

Safety

Access site events by type

Grade 1 bleeding
85/92, 92.4%
Minor hematomas
7/92, 7.6%
No major vascular complications occurred

Original publication

Figure-of-8 Suture With a 3-Way Tap Versus Manual Compression After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: The HARNESS Randomized Controlled Trial. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. Published 19 February 2026. doi:10.1016/j.jacep.2026.01.014

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.