Heart failure & cardiomyopathiesResearch article

Heart Failure Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Scoring Systems: A Scoping Review

Circ Heart FailPublished

  • scoping review

Authors' conclusion

Multiple, disparate scores have been developed to quantify heart failure with reduced ejection fraction GDMT optimization, undermining the original intent. Key gaps in scores include heterogeneous weighting of drug classes and doses, minimal incorporation of intolerance to identify maximum-tolerated therapy, and heterogeneous incorporation of therapies beyond quadruple therapy. Future studies should focus on clear reporting and justification of the selected GDMT score, and the use of existing scores that incorporate relevant contemporary agents.

Study context

Population
Published studies of heart failure guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) scores (heart failure with reduced ejection fraction)patients across 26 included studies (from 544 records) · cohorts 19 · randomized trials 7
Participants
354,281 participants

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Scores used across studies

Studies that utilized different scores

25 (96%)

Adaptations of the Optimal Medical Therapy score

13

Further findings

Drug classes counted in scores

Separated sacubitril-valsartan from other RASi
18
Incorporated sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors
15
Captured additional drug classes
8
Scores adjusted for contraindications or intolerance
2
All counted RASi, beta-blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists

Use of GDMT scores across studies

descriptor
N=14
covariate
N=11
predictor of future outcomes
N=12
end point for GDMT optimization interventions
N=8

Original publication

Heart Failure Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Scoring Systems: A Scoping Review. Circ Heart Fail. Published 9 April 2026. doi:10.1161/circheartfailure.125.013881

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it