Coronary disease & ACSSecondary analysis

Heart Rate and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Post–Myocardial Infarction Patients Treated by β-Blockers: A Secondary Analysis of the ABYSS Trial

CirculationPublished

  • Secondary analysis of the ABYSS randomised trial
  • prespecified

Authors' conclusion

In stabilized post-MI patients with preserved ejection fraction, higher HR remains associated with adverse cardiovascular events and mortality in the reperfusion era.

Study context

Population
Stable post-MI patients (LVEF ≥40%) randomised to continue or interrupt β-blockers
Participants
3,698 patients
Comparison
Prerandomization HR tertiles; β-blocker continuation vs interruption
Primary endpoint
Death, MI, stroke or CV rehospitalization

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

Primary end point (death, MI, stroke or CV rehospitalization) by baseline HR tertile

Baseline HR not associated with primary end point (T1 <60 bpm vs T2 60 to <68 vs T3 ≥68)

22.4% versus 21.8% versus 21.6%; P=0.867

Secondary outcomes

OutcomeT1T2T3adjusted HR (95% CI)
Death, MI or stroke5.5%6.4%9.2%1.55 (1.14–2.12)
Death, MI, stroke or HF6.5%7.1%10.4%1.47 (1.11–1.97)

All-cause mortality

  • Death, myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke: across tertiles P<0.001
  • Death, MI, stroke or HF: across tertiles P=0.007
  • All-cause mortality: P=0.004
  • All-cause mortality: P trend=0.008

On-treatment HR after β-blocker interruption · during follow-up

Dose-dependent HR increase with interruption
≈10-13 bpm

Interruption vs continuation, by HR tertile and LVEF category

Association of interruption with worse outcomes consistent across HR tertiles (no significant interaction) and LVEF categories (40% to 49% and >50%)

Original publication

Heart Rate and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Post–Myocardial Infarction Patients Treated by β-Blockers: A Secondary Analysis of the ABYSS Trial. Circulation. Published 10 June 2026. doi:10.1161/circulationaha.125.078635

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it