Acute cardiac care & resuscitation

Identifying Cardiogenic Shock Sub-Phenotypes with Machine Learning: A Multicenter Study Combining Clinical and Echocardiographic Data

JACC AdvPublished Prospective multicentre observational cohort study

Authors' conclusion

Machine learning, newly integrating echocardiographic data, identified 5 distinct CS phenotypes, each with unique clinical/echocardiographic features and mortality risks.

Study context

Population
Patients admitted to cardiac ICUs with overt cardiogenic shock, from 2021
Participants
172 patients
Exposure
Cardiogenic shock (CS) phenotypes IV and V vs phenotype I
Outcome
In-hospital mortality
Methodological detailsunsupervised machine learning (K-Means clustering)
  • Unsupervised machine learning (K-Means clustering)

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

In-hospital mortality
Each group vs IHazard ratio (95% CI)P value
IV
2.78(1.07–7.19)
P < 0.05
V
2.80(1.10–7.14)
P < 0.05

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Mortality prediction after adjustment

Remained independent after adjustment for confounders and of SCAI stage

Original publication

Identifying Cardiogenic Shock Sub-Phenotypes with Machine Learning: A Multicenter Study Combining Clinical and Echocardiographic Data. JACC Adv. Published 28 October 2025. doi:10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.102257

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.