Acute cardiac care & resuscitation
Identifying Cardiogenic Shock Sub-Phenotypes with Machine Learning: A Multicenter Study Combining Clinical and Echocardiographic Data
Authors' conclusion
Machine learning, newly integrating echocardiographic data, identified 5 distinct CS phenotypes, each with unique clinical/echocardiographic features and mortality risks.
Study context
- Population
- Patients admitted to cardiac ICUs with overt cardiogenic shock, from 2021
- Participants
- 172 patients
- Exposure
- Cardiogenic shock (CS) phenotypes IV and V vs phenotype I
- Outcome
- In-hospital mortality
Methodological detailsunsupervised machine learning (K-Means clustering)
- Unsupervised machine learning (K-Means clustering)
Main finding
As reported in the abstract
In-hospital mortality
Each group vs IHazard ratio (95% CI)P value
IV
2.78(1.07–7.19)
P < 0.05V
2.80(1.10–7.14)
P < 0.05Observational data: associations, not effects.
Further findings
Mortality prediction after adjustment
- Remained independent after adjustment for confounders and of SCAI stage
Original publication
Identifying Cardiogenic Shock Sub-Phenotypes with Machine Learning: A Multicenter Study Combining Clinical and Echocardiographic Data. JACC Adv. Published 28 October 2025. doi:10. 1016/ j. jacadv. 2025. 102257
Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it