Acute cardiac care & resuscitationMeta-analysis

Impact of Cardiac Rhythm Dynamics during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation on Clinical Outcomes in Patients Treated with Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (ECPR): A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

ResuscitationPublished

  • Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
  • random-effects model analysis with the Hartung-Knapp adjustment
  • Ten observational studies

Authors' conclusion

Rhythm dynamics provide valuable prognostic insights for candidates for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Rhythm decay toward asystole may predict resuscitation failure and poor neurological survival, suggesting that it should prompt a critical re-evaluation of the appropriateness of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Study context

Population
Subjects with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest treated with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Participants
5,183 Ten observational studies
Comparison
Rhythm improvement vs refractory non-shockable rhythms; rhythm decay vs sustained shockable rhythm
Outcome
Survival with a favorable neurological outcome
Follow-up
Longest

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

Relative risk (95% CI)
Rhythm Improvement vs refractory non-shockable rhythmsGRADE: Low
3.12(1.26–7.74)
Rhythm Decay vs sustained shockable rhythmGRADE: Moderate
0.41(0.21–0.80)

Further pooled results

OutcomeRR (95% CI)
Good neurological recovery, by type of rhythm decay (subgroup) — Rhythm Decay vs sustained shockable rhythm · decay toward asystole; GRADE: Moderate0.20 (0.09–0.45)
Good neurological recovery, by type of rhythm decay (subgroup) — Rhythm Decay vs sustained shockable rhythm0.62 (0.31–1.25)
  • Good neurological recovery, by type of rhythm decay (subgroup): decay toward pulseless electrical activity; did not reach statistical significance; GRADE: Low

Original publication

Impact of Cardiac Rhythm Dynamics during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation on Clinical Outcomes in Patients Treated with Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (ECPR): A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Resuscitation. Published 6 October 2026. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2026.111348

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it