Heart failure & cardiomyopathiesCohort study

Impact of Donor Left Ventricular Geometric Remodeling and Hypertrophy on Heart Acceptance and Recipient Survival

JACC Heart FailPublished

  • Cohort study
  • multicentre

Authors' conclusion

Classifying donor hearts using LV geometric remodeling patterns may reduce the number turned down for "hypertrophy" without compromising recipient survival.

Study context

Population
Brain-dead heart donors, US DHS (Donor Heart Study), February 2015 to May 20201,874 with nonacceptance surveys
Participants
3,647 donors
Exposure
Donor left ventricular (LV) geometric remodeling patterns vs LV wall thickness >1.3 cm
Outcome
Prevalence of LV geometric remodeling patterns (ASE guidelines) and association with transplant acceptance and recipient mortality
Follow-up
3 years

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

3-year recipient survival
Each group vs normal geometryAdjusted hazard ratio (95% CI)
Increased LV wall thickness
0.94(0.73–1.21)
Concentric remodeling
1.13(0.86–1.47)
Concentric hypertrophy
0.64(0.35–1.15)
Concentric remodeling most common pattern
58.5%

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

OutcomeNormal geometryConcentric remodelingConcentric hypertrophyIncreased LV wall thickness
Reclassification of hearts with LV wall thickness >1.3 cmNot reported in the abstract52.1%43.8%Not reported in the abstract
LV hypertrophy listed as reason for rejection (nonacceptance surveys)10.8%60.0%Not reported in the abstractNot reported in the abstract
LV hypertrophy listed as reason for rejection (nonacceptance surveys) — LV hypertrophy listed as reason for rejection
20.3%
  • LV hypertrophy listed as reason for rejection (nonacceptance surveys): n = 1,874 nonacceptance surveys

Original publication

Impact of Donor Left Ventricular Geometric Remodeling and Hypertrophy on Heart Acceptance and Recipient Survival. JACC Heart Fail. Published 20 May 2026. doi:10.1016/j.jchf.2026.103150

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it