Valvular & structural heart diseaseMeta-analysis

Impact of Female Sex on Survival and Outcomes After Mitral Valve Surgery

JACC AdvPublished

  • systematic review and meta-analysis
  • random-effects models
  • time-to-event data reconstructed
  • meta-regression

Authors' conclusion

Women are more likely to undergo mitral valve replacement and have higher recurrent regurgitation, whereas adjusted mortality is similar, suggesting potential benefit of repair-focused strategies when feasible.

Study context

Population
Men and women undergoing surgical mitral valve surgerypatients in sixteen studies
Participants
42,587 men
Comparison
female sex vs men undergoing surgical mitral valve surgery

Pooled result

Primary mitral valve replacement

Odds ratio

2.15

95% CI 1.62–2.84

By group

Women vs Men
OR 2.15 (95% CI 1.62–2.84)

As reported in the abstract

Further pooled results

OutcomeEstimate
In-hospital mortalityOR 1.38 (95% CI 1.27–1.50)
All-cause mortality — Women vs Men · unadjustedHR 1.35 (95% CI 1.25–1.47)
All-cause mortality — Women vs Men · adjusted; not significantly differentHR 0.96 (95% CI 0.91–1.01)
Recurrent MR — Women vs Men · unadjustedHR 1.57 (95% CI 1.14–2.15)
Recurrent MR — Women vs Men · adjusted; remained higher in womenHR 1.68 (95% CI 1.13–2.51)
Reoperation — Women vs Men · unadjusted; similarHR 1.35 (95% CI 0.96–1.89)
Reoperation — Women vs Men · adjusted; not significantly differentHR 1.33 (95% CI 0.81–2.18)
Outcomemean difference (years) (95% CI)
Age · women significantly older than men2.8 (1.5–4.0)

Proportion of women in cohort

Women accounted for (95% CI: 36%-42%)
39%

Meta-regression: mitral valve replacement proportion and mortality in women

higher mitral valve replacement proportion was associated with increased mortality in women

Original publication

Impact of Female Sex on Survival and Outcomes After Mitral Valve Surgery. JACC Adv. Published 20 May 2026. doi:10.1016/j.jacadv.2026.102721

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it