HypertensionMeta-analysis

Impact of flavan-3-ols on blood pressure and endothelial function in diverse populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Eur J Prev CardiolPublished

  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials
  • random-effects
  • meta-regression

Authors' conclusion

Flavan-3-ol-rich foods considerably reduce elevated BP and improve endothelial function independent of blood pressure supporting their use for cardiovascular prevention.

Study context

Population
Diverse populations in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of flavan-3-ol intake (published 1946–03/2024)145 RCTs in 109 publications
Participants
5,205 participants
Comparison
Flavan-3-ol-rich interventions vs control
Outcome
BP and endothelial function (flow-mediated dilation)

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

Office and 24 h ambulatory BP (SBP/DBP), chronic repetitive consumption

Office blood pressure (BP) change with flavan-3-ol interventions, mmHg

SBP/DBP −2.8 [95% CI −3.9, −1.7]/−2.0 [−2.6, −1.3] mmHg (95% CI)

24 h ambulatory BP change with flavan-3-ol interventions, mmHg

SBP/DBP −3.7 [−5.8, −1.6]/−2.6 [−4.5, −0.8] mmHg (95% CI)

Further pooled results

BP with elevated/hypertensive baseline BP or categorical hypertension (subgroup)

Office BP change, mmHg (SBP/DBP)
−5.9 [−10.0, −1.8]/−2.7 [−4.4, −1.0] mmHg
24 h ABP change, mmHg (SBP/DBP)
−6.8 [−16.3, 2.8]/−5.1 [−12.5, 2.2] mmHg

Meta-regression of BP lowering

BP lowering inversely related to baseline BP, not to proportion with CVD, DM or study duration; dose-dependent on epicatechin dose only in cocoa studies

Flow-mediated dilation

Increase after acute consumption
+2.0% [1.6, 2.3]
Increase after repetitive consumption
+1.7% [1.3, 2.2]
  • independent of BP

Safety

Adverse events

Reported adverse events minor and low
0.4%

Original publication

Impact of flavan-3-ols on blood pressure and endothelial function in diverse populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Prev Cardiol. Published 24 March 2025. doi:10.1093/eurjpc/zwaf173

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it