Impact of Left Ventricular to Mitral Valve Ring Mismatch on Recurrent Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation After Ring Annuloplasty
Primary result · Moderate or greater MR (recurrence)Result — go to the resultOdds ratio 2.20 95% CI 1.05–4.62Authors' conclusion
LV-MV ring size mismatch is associated with increased risk of MR recurrence.
Study context
- Population
- Patients with moderate or severe ischemic MR who received mitral valve (MV) repair (restrictive ring annuloplasty)
- Participants
- 214 patients
- Comparison
- LV-MV ring mismatch and recurrent MR
- Primary endpoint
- Recurrent MR (moderate or greater)
- Follow-up
- 1 year after surgery
Primary result
Moderate or greater MR (recurrence) · 1 year
Odds ratio
2.20
95% CI 1.05–4.62
P = 0.038
LVESd/ring size (per 0.5 increase)
OR 2.20 (95% CI 1.05–4.62); P = 0.038
Per 0.5 increase, as printed
As reported in the abstract
- Patients with moderate or greater MR at 1 year
- 45 of 214 (21%)
- Univariable: larger LV end-systolic dimension (LVESd) associated with recurrent MR
- P = 0.02
- Univariable: LVESd/ring size associated with recurrent MR
- P = 0.007
Original publication
Impact of Left Ventricular to Mitral Valve Ring Mismatch on Recurrent Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation After Ring Annuloplasty. Circulation. Published 25 October 2016. doi:10.
Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it