Cohort study

Improved Outcomes After Pulmonary Valve Replacement in Repaired Tetralogy of Fallot

J Am Coll CardiolPublished

  • Retrospective cohort study
  • propensity-score matched
  • multicentre registry

Authors' conclusion

Compared with rTOF patients who did not receive PVR, propensity score-matched individuals receiving PVR had lower risk of a composite endpoint of death or sustained VT.

Study context

Population
Patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot (rTOF) in the INDICATOR registrymatched cohort n = 524
Participants
1,143 patients
Exposure
Pulmonary valve replacement (PVR) vs no PVR
Outcome
Time to earliest occurrence of death or sustained VT

Main finding

Death or sustained VT

Adjusted hazard ratio

0.41

95% CI 0.21–0.81

P = 0.010

PVR vs No-PVR
adjusted HR 0.41 (95% CI 0.21–0.81); P = 0.010

As reported in the abstract

Primary outcome events, whole cohort
82

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

OutcomeHR (95% CI)P value
Death or sustained VT, by RV end-systolic volume index (subgroup) — PVR vs No-PVR · RV end-systolic volume index >80 mL/m²0.32 (0.16–0.62)P < 0.001
Death or sustained VT, by RV end-systolic volume index (subgroup) — PVR vs No-PVR · RV end-systolic volume index ≤80 mL/m²0.86 (0.38–1.92)P = 0.70
  • Death or sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT), by right ventricular (RV) end-systolic volume index (subgroup): interaction P = 0.046; full cohort

Original publication

Improved Outcomes After Pulmonary Valve Replacement in Repaired Tetralogy of Fallot. J Am Coll Cardiol. Published 30 May 2023. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2023.02.052

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it