Valvular & structural heart diseaseCohort study

Incidence, Predictors, and Management of Conduction Disturbances After Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement

JACC Cardiovasc IntervPublished

  • Multicentre registry cohort study
  • consecutive patients

Authors' conclusion

HAVB occurred in 13.5% of PPI-naive patients who underwent TTVR. The majority of cases of HAVB (88%) were observed in the first week after TTVR. Baseline left bundle branch block or left anterior or posterior fascicular block confers a high risk for HAVB after TTVR.

Study context

Population
Patients undergoing transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) in the TRIPLACE registry185 permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)-naive analysed
Participants
263 patients
Outcome
High-grade atrioventricular block (HAVB)
Follow-up
1 month post-TTVR

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

HAVB · 1 month

HAVB in PPI-naive patients (25 of 185)

13.5%

HAVB within first week post-TTVR

88%

Time to HAVB, median (Q1-Q3 2.0-5.0)

3.0 days

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Predictor of HAVB

Comparisonadjusted OR (95% CI)P value
Baseline left bundle branch block or left anterior or posterior fascicular block · adjusted for age and degree of device oversizing3.63 (1.28–10.37)P = 0.016

Timing of HAVB

HAVB within the first week post-TTVR
88%
Median time to HAVB (Q1-Q3: 2.0-5.0)
3.0 days

New-onset right bundle branch block

New-onset right bundle branch block
20.6%

PPI technique

Leadless technologies
45.5%
Coronary sinus leads
27.3%
Transvalvular dual-chamber pacemakers
27.3%

Original publication

Incidence, Predictors, and Management of Conduction Disturbances After Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. Published 9 July 2025. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2025.05.029

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it