Heart failure & cardiomyopathiesMeta-analysis

Interventions for Optimization of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy

JAMA CardiolPublished

  • Systematic review of randomised trials

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, CINAHL, Web of Science, January 2010 to November 2023 · Bias assessed with Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine

Authors' conclusion

Initiatives that used interdisciplinary teams, largely comprised of nurses and pharmacists, most consistently led to improvements in GDMT.

Study context

Population
Patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF)
Participants
19,840 patients · 28 RCTs
Comparison
System-level quality improvement interventions vs usual care
Outcome
GDMT use

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

Proportion of patients on target doses of GDMT

Interdisciplinary titration clinics vs usual care: greater proportion on target doses of β-blockers

10% to 60%

Interdisciplinary titration clinics vs usual care: greater proportion on target doses of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors

2% to 53%

Parts of this Brief are withheld: the automatic checks could not confirm them against the abstract.

Original publication

Interventions for Optimization of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy. JAMA Cardiol. Published 1 April 2024. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2023.5627

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it