Heart failure & cardiomyopathies

Lead replacement due to non-infectious reasons in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy in long-term follow-up

ESC Heart FailPublished

  • consecutive patients who received conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implants at a university hospital
  • single university hospital
  • 2002–2019
+2 more
  • single university hospital
  • 2002–2019

Authors' conclusion

Almost 25% of patients with CRT require lead replacement during long-term follow-up for non-infectious reasons, and half of those require replacement within the first year. Over 10 years, nearly every second patient requires a lead-related redo procedure. Lead replacement was not associated with long-term all-cause mortality. Systematic proficiency-based training should be introduced as a routine strategy in the education of novice implanters.

Study context

Population
Patients who received conventional CRT implants at a university hospital between 2002 and 2019
Participants
1,059 consecutive patients
Comparison
lead-related re-do procedures vs no need for re-intervention
  • lead-related re-do proceduresn = 251

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Lead replacement for non-infectious reasons · median follow-up of 1661 days (interquartile range: 815-2792)

leads replaced

324

patients with lead replacement

251 patients (23.7%)

overall crude incidence of lead replacement

19.4 events per 1000 lead-years

of those who required lead replacement, underwent the procedure within the first year after CRT implantation

126 subjects (50.2%)

Further findings

Independent predictors of lead replacement (multivariable analysis)

ComparisonHR (95% CI)P value
Duration of the index CRT procedure · multivariable analysis1.03 (1.01–1.06)P = 0.02
OutcomeHR (95% CI)P value
Independent predictors of lead replacement (multivariable analysis) — fluoroscopy time · per-unit; unit not printed · multivariable analysis1.11 (1.02–1.15)P = 0.01

Overall long-term mortality

Overall long-term mortality — not associated
P = .3

Lead replacement among patients followed for more than 10 years

patients followed for more than 10 years
n = 143; 13.5%
of those followed >10 years, one or more lead replacements
67 subjects (46.8%)

Replaced leads by type

left ventricular
11.2%; 21.4 replacements per 1000 lead-years
right ventricular
10.8%; 20.5 replacements per 1000 lead-years
right atrial
4%; 7.6 replacements per 1000 lead-years
  • approximate rates

Safety

Device-related infective endocarditis

Device-related infective endocarditis — not associated
P = .82

Original publication

Lead replacement due to non-infectious reasons in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy in long-term follow-up. ESC Heart Fail. Published 22 June 2026. doi:10.1093/eschf/xvag176

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it