Lone Atrial Fibrillation Is Associated With Impaired Left Ventricular Energetics That Persists Despite Successful Catheter Ablation

CirculationPublished Prospective case-control study

Authors' conclusion

Patients with lone AF have impaired myocardial energetics and subtle LV dysfunction, which do not normalize after ablation.

Study context

Population
Patients with symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent lone atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing catheter ablation
Participants
53 vs 25
Comparison
Lone AF patients undergoing ablation vs matched controls in sinus rhythm (SR)
  • Lone AFn = 53
  • Controlsn = 25reference
Outcome
Left ventricular (LV) function and energetics before ablation
Follow-up
Before ablation
Methodological detailsmatched controls, MRI for LV ejection fraction (LVEF), peak systolic circumferential strain (PSCS) and left atrial volumes and function; phosphorus-31 MR spectroscopy for phosphocreatine/ATP ratio, AF burden by 7-day Holter before and after ablation; intermittent ECG event monitoring after ablation
  • Matched controls
  • MRI for LVEF, PSCS and left atrial volumes and function; phosphorus-31 MR spectroscopy for phosphocreatine/ATP ratio
  • AF burden by 7-day Holter before and after ablation; intermittent ECG event monitoring after ablation

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

GroupLVEF (median, IQR)PSCS (median, IQR)Phosphocreatine/ATP ratio
Lone AF61% [IQR, 52%-65%]−15% [IQR, −11 to −18%]1.81±0.35
Controls71% [IQR, 69%-73%]−18% [IQR, −17% to −19%]2.05±0.29

LVEF (median, IQR)

Lone AF61% [IQR, 52%-65%]
Controls71% [IQR, 69%-73%]

PSCS (median, IQR)

Lone AF−15% [IQR, −11 to −18%]
Controls−18% [IQR, −17% to −19%]

Phosphocreatine/ATP ratio

Lone AF1.81±0.35
Controls2.05±0.29
  • Lone AF vs Controls: P < 0.001 — LVEF
  • Lone AF vs Controls: P = 0.002 — PSCS
  • Lone AF vs Controls: P = 0.004 — phosphocreatine/ATP ratio

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Left atrial size and function before ablation

Patients had dilated and impaired left atria vs controls
all P<0.001

LVEF and PSCS change early after ablation, patients recovering SR from AF · 1-4 days

LVEF change
7.0±10%, P=0.005
PSCS change
−3.5±4.3%, P=0.001
Unchanged in those in SR during both assessments
both P=NS

AF burden · 6 to 9 months after ablation

Reduced from 54% [IQR, 1.5%-100%] to 0% [IQR 0%-0.1%]
P < 0.001

LVEF and PSCS after ablation · 6 to 9 months after ablation

No further improvement
both P=NS
LVEF remained impaired vs controls
P < 0.001
PSCS remained impaired vs controls
P = 0.003

Atrial function after ablation · 6 to 9 months after ablation

No significant improvement from before ablation
P = NS
Remained lower than controls
P < 0.001

Phosphocreatine/ATP ratio after ablation

Unaffected by heart rhythm during assessment and AF burden before ablation
both P=NS
Unchanged after ablation
P = 0.57
Lower than controls regardless of recovery of SR
P = 0.006
Lower than controls regardless of freedom from recurrent AF
P = 0.002

Original publication

Lone Atrial Fibrillation Is Associated With Impaired Left Ventricular Energetics That Persists Despite Successful Catheter Ablation. Circulation. Published 14 September 2016. doi:10.1161/circulationaha.116.022931

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.