Coronary disease & ACSCohort study

Long-Term and Temporal Relationships Between Post-Stent Fractional Flow Reserve and Clinical Outcomes

JACC Cardiovasc IntervPublished

  • Registry-based cohort study
  • international registry

Authors' conclusion

The prognostic impact of post-PCI FFR on TVF persisted over a 5-year follow-up period, but it was more prominent during the first 3 years after PCI. In contrast, its impact on TVR in the nonstented segments was sustained throughout the entire 5-year follow-up period.

Study context

Population
Patients after angiographically successful drug-eluting stent implantation with post-PCI fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement and 5-year follow-upcompleted 5-year follow-up
Participants
2,128 patients
Exposure
Low vs high post-PCI FFR
Outcome
Target vessel failure (TVF) (cardiac death, target vessel MI, target vessel revascularization (TVR))
Follow-up
5 years

Main finding

TVF

Adjusted hazard ratio

1.95

95% CI 1.46–2.62

P < 0.001

Low post-PCI FFR vs High post-PCI FFR
adjusted HR 1.95 (95% CI 1.46–2.62); P < 0.001

As reported in the abstract

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Outcomeadjusted HR (95% CI)P value
TVF within and beyond 3 years after PCI — Low post-PCI FFR vs High post-PCI FFR · within 3 years2.00 (1.44–2.78)P < 0.001
TVF within and beyond 3 years after PCI — Low post-PCI FFR vs High post-PCI FFR · after 3 years1.80 (0.94–3.44)P = 0.076
TVR in the nonstented segment · within and beyond 3 years — Low post-PCI FFR vs High post-PCI FFR · within 3 years2.78 (1.43–5.39)P = 0.003
TVR in the nonstented segment · within and beyond 3 years — Low post-PCI FFR vs High post-PCI FFR · beyond 3 years6.73 (2.02–22.37)P = 0.002

Original publication

Long-Term and Temporal Relationships Between Post-Stent Fractional Flow Reserve and Clinical Outcomes. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. Published 8 December 2025. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2025.09.034

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it