Arrhythmias & electrophysiologyCohort study
Long-term comparative efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease: A nationwide observational study
- Nationwide observational study
- Clalit database
Authors' conclusion
In patients with AF and CKD, OAC therapy improved efficacy outcomes without increasing bleeding risk. DOACs were more effective and safer than warfarin, supporting their use as the preferred anticoagulant in this high-risk population. Appropriate dosing and therapeutic monitoring are essential to maximize benefits and minimize bleeding complications.
Study context
- Population
- Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD)AF patients with CKD
- Participants
- 18,980 patients
- Exposure
- Oral anticoagulation (OAC) vs no OAC and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs warfarin
- Outcome
- Composite-safety (intracranial hemorrhage, gastrointestinal bleeding) and efficacy (ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, embolism, all-cause mortality)
Main finding
As reported in the abstract
Hazard ratio
0.57
95% CI 0.52–0.62
Observational data: associations, not effects.
Further findings
| Outcome | HR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|
| All-cause mortality · reduced with OAC | 0.32 (0.29–0.36) | |
| Composite bleeding and primary efficacy events among appropriately anticoagulated patients (subgroup) — DOACs vs warfarin · composite bleeding; no longer significant | 0.87 (0.52–1.47) | |
| Composite bleeding and primary efficacy events among appropriately anticoagulated patients (subgroup) — DOACs vs warfarin · primary efficacy events; fewer with DOACs | 0.75 (0.60–0.94) | |
| 0.20.5125Hazard ratio (log scale) |
Thromboembolic events and bleeding outcomes (OAC vs no OAC)
- No significant differences
Ischemic stroke (DOACs vs warfarin)
- No significant differences
Safety
| Outcome | HR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|
| Intracranial hemorrhage · higher rates with warfarin | 0.51 (0.32–0.8) | |
| 0.20.5125Hazard ratio (log scale) |
Parts of this Brief are withheld: the automatic checks could not confirm them against the abstract.
Original publication
Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it