Acute cardiac care & resuscitation

Medical Malpractice Claims for Sports Cardiology Cases Among Young Athletes

JACC AdvPublished comprehensive retrospective review of medical malpractice/negligence lawsuits

Authors' conclusion

Medical malpractice/negligence claims regarding cardiac cases in young competitive athletes in the United States were rare (<1 case/y), although the financial settlements were significant. This study supports ongoing efforts to improve emergency preparedness and the cardiac emergency medical response for young competitive athletes.

Study context

Population
Young competitive athletes aged 12 to 40 years (middle school, high school, competitive club, collegiate, semiprofessional/professional, or national/international level) in the United States who experienced SCA/D or had a diagnosis associated with SCA/D, in medical malpractice/negligence claimscases met inclusion criteria from 1978 to 2022
Participants
35/586 athletes
Outcome
Case outcome
Methodological details4 search strategies, from inception to October 2024
  • 4 search strategies
  • From inception to October 2024

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Favorable plaintiff outcome or settlement

10 of 35

29%

Known settlements or awards range

$600,000 to $24,000,000

Favorable defendant outcome or dismissal

16 of 35

46%

Case outcome undisclosed/unknown

9 of 35

26%

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Most common primary allegation

Negligent emergency medical response
13/35, 37%
Failure to diagnose cardiovascular disease
9/35, 26%

Original publication

Medical Malpractice Claims for Sports Cardiology Cases Among Young Athletes. JACC Adv. Published 30 June 2025. doi:10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101915

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.