Acute cardiac care & resuscitationCohort study

MIRACLE2 Score Compared With Downtime and Current Selection Criterion for Invasive Cardiovascular Therapies After OHCA

JACC Cardiovasc IntervPublished

  • Retrospective cohort study
  • multicentre (6 centres)
  • registry-based

Authors' conclusion

The MIRACLE2 score has superior prediction of outcome after OHCA than downtime and higher discrimination of poor outcome than the current RCT recruitment criteria.

Study context

Population
Patients after OHCA, European Cardiac Arrest Registry (EUCAR), May 2012–September 2022
Participants
1,259 patients
Exposure
MIRACLE2 score vs downtime and current randomized controlled trial (RCT) recruitment criteria
Outcome
Poor neurologic outcome (cerebral performance category 3-5)
Follow-up
Hospital discharge

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Discrimination for poor neurologic outcome
GroupAUC
MIRACLE20.877 (95% CI: 0.854-0.897)
Zero flow0.610 (95% CI: 0.577-0.642)
Low flow0.725 (95% CI: 0.695-0.754)
Total downtime0.732 (95% CI: 0.701-0.760)

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Association with poor outcome (multivariable logistic regression)

ComparisonOR (95% CI)P value
MIRACLE22.23 (1.98–2.51)P < 0.0001
Zero flow1.07 (1.01–1.13)P = 0.013
Low flow1.04 (0.99–1.09)P = 0.054
Total downtime0.99 (0.95–1.03)P = 0.52
OutcomeValuesEstimateP value
Poor outcome by downtimeDowntime <30 minutes 41.8% · Downtime >30 minutes 79.3%
PPV for poor outcome among those modeled for exclusion from recruitmentMIRACLE2 ≥5 PPV 0.92 · CULPRIT-SHOCK criteria PPV 0.80 · EUROSHOCK criteria PPV 0.74 · ECLS-SHOCK criteria PPV 0.81
  • PPV for poor outcome among those modeled for exclusion from recruitment: P < 0.001

Original publication

MIRACLE2 Score Compared With Downtime and Current Selection Criterion for Invasive Cardiovascular Therapies After OHCA. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. Published 21 August 2023. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2023.08.010

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it