Coronary disease & ACSCohort study

Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries as compared with myocardial infarction and obstructive coronary disease: outcomes in a Medicare population

Eur Heart JPublished

  • Retrospective cohort study
  • multicentre
  • observational
  • registry-based (NCDR CathPCI linked to CMS claims)

Authors' conclusion

This study confirms an unfavourable prognosis in elderly patients with MINOCA undergoing coronary angiography, with one in five patients with MINOCA suffering a major adverse event over 12 months.

Study context

Population
Patients ≥65 years with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing coronary angiography, NCDR CathPCI Registry linked to Medicare claims, July 2009–December 2013
Participants
286,780 AMI admissions
Exposure
MINOCA vs MICAD
  • MINOCAn = 16,849
Outcome
MACE:
  • All-cause mortality
  • Re-hospitalization for AMI
  • HF
  • Stroke
Follow-up
12 months

Main finding

MACE

Hazard ratio

0.57

95% CI 0.55–0.59

By group

MINOCA vs MICAD
HR 0.57 (95% CI 0.55–0.59)

As reported in the abstract

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Secondary outcomes

All-cause mortality · 12 months

Re-hospitalization for AMI · 12 months

Re-hospitalization for HF · 12 months

Re-hospitalization for stroke · 12 months

  • All-cause mortality: P < 0.001
  • Re-hospitalization for AMI: P < 0.001
  • Re-hospitalization for heart failure (HF): P < 0.001
  • Re-hospitalization for stroke: P = 0.128

Adjusted risks of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) components · 12 months

Pattern similar to MACE

Original publication

Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries as compared with myocardial infarction and obstructive coronary disease: outcomes in a Medicare population. Eur Heart J. Published 21 June 2019. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz403

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it