Heart failure & cardiomyopathiesMeta-analysis
Myocardial Strain Measurements Derived From MR Feature-Tracking
- Systematic review and meta-analysis
- random-effects model
- meta-regression
Authors' conclusion
This study demonstrated the normal values of CMR-FT strain parameters in all 4 cardiac chambers in healthy subjects.
Study context
- Population
- Healthy adults with myocardial strain of all 4 chambers measured by cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking (CMR-FT)
- Participants
- 3,359 adults · 44 studies
- Outcome
- Normal values (pooled means) of CMR-FT myocardial strain in all 4 cardiac chambers
Pooled result
As reported in the abstract
Pooled mean strain (CMR-FT), healthy adults
- Left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS) pooled mean
- −18.4% (95% CI −19.2% to −17.6%)
- LV global radial strain pooled mean
- 43.7% (95% CI 40.0%-47.4%)
- LV-GCS pooled mean
- −21.4% (95% CI −22.3% to −20.6%)
- LA-GLS total strain pooled mean
- 34.9% (95% CI 29.6%-40.2%)
- LA-GLS passive strain pooled mean
- 21.3% (95% CI 16.6%-26.1%)
- LA-GLS active strain pooled mean
- 14.3% (95% CI 11.8%-16.8%)
- RV-GLS pooled mean
- −24.0% (95% CI −25.8% to −22.1%)
- RA global longitudinal total strain pooled mean
- 36.3% (95% CI 15.5%-57.0%)
Further pooled results
Sources of heterogeneity (meta-regression)
- LV-GLS: field strength (I2 = 98.6%)
- P < 0.001
- LV-GLS: FT vendor (I2 = 98.5%)
- P < 0.001
- LA-GLSactive: regional distribution (I2 = 97.3%)
- P < 0.001
- LA-GLSactive: FT vendor (I2 = 97.4%)
- P < 0.001
- LV-GCS: FT vendor (I2 = 98.8%)
- P = 0.02
- RV-GLS: FT vendor (I2 = 93.8%)
- P = 0.01
- Sex, age and MR vendor: no effect on normal values
Original publication
Myocardial Strain Measurements Derived From MR Feature-Tracking. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. Published 19 July 2023. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2023.05.019
Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it