Valvular & structural heart diseaseCohort study

Non–Vitamin K Antagonist Versus Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant Agents After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

JACC Cardiovasc IntervPublished

  • Prospective registry cohort study
  • propensity-score matched
  • national registry

Authors' conclusion

At 5 years after TAVR, VKAs are associated with a higher risk for all-cause mortality, a lower risk for disabling stroke, and a similar rate of life-threatening or major bleeding compared with DOACs.

Study context

Population
Consecutive patients undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with concomitant indications for OAC, SwissTAVI Registry, February 2011–June 2021matched cohort
Participants
1,454 vs 1,454
Exposure
VKA vs DOAC after transfemoral TAVR
  • VKAn = 1,454
  • DOACn = 1,454reference
Outcome
Net clinical benefit (all-cause mortality, MI, stroke, life-threatening or major bleeding); primary safety endpoint: life-threatening and major bleeding
Follow-up
30 days, 1 year and 5 years after TAVR

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Net clinical benefit and primary safety endpoint · 30 days, 1 and 5 years
  • No significant difference between VKA and DOAC in net clinical benefit and safety endpoints at 30 days, 1 and 5 years
  • matched cohort

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

OutcomeHR (95% CI)
All-cause mortality · 1 year1.28 (1.01–1.62)
All-cause mortality · 5 years1.25 (1.11–1.40)
Disabling stroke, long-term (excluding periprocedural events) · lower with VKA0.64 (0.46–0.90)

Original publication

Non–Vitamin K Antagonist Versus Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant Agents After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. Published 12 February 2024. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2023.11.038

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it