Arrhythmias & electrophysiologyCohort study

Novel or established cryoballoon ablation system for pulmonary vein isolation: the prospective ICE-AGE-1 study

EuropacePublished

  • Prospective cohort study
  • historical control
  • consecutive patients

Authors' conclusion

The novel POLARx CB showed similar safety, efficacy, and 1-year recurrence-free survival rates compared to the AF-CB4. A higher rate of real-time electrical PV recordings and significantly lower balloon temperatures were observed using the POLARx as compared to AF-CB4.

Study context

Population
Patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing cryoballoon PVI
Participants
103 vs 102
Exposure
POLARx cryoballoon vs Arctic Front Advance Pro cryoballoon for PVI
  • POLARxn = 103
  • AF-CB4n = 102reference

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Freedom from AF or atrial tachycardia recurrence (after 90-day blanking) · 12 months

P = 0.804

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Real-time PVI visualised (% of PVs)

P < 0.001

Mean procedure time

P = 0.0509

OutcomePOLARxAF-CB4P value
Mean minimal CB temperaturemean −56.1 (SD 8.3) °Cmean −46.9 (SD 10.1) °CP < 0.0001

Pulmonary vein (PV) isolation

All PVs isolated except one PV in the POLARx group

Original publication

Novel or established cryoballoon ablation system for pulmonary vein isolation: the prospective ICE-AGE-1 study. Europace. Published 17 August 2023. doi:10.1093/europace/euad248

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it