Heart failure & cardiomyopathiesSecondary analysis

NT-proBNP and high intensity care for acute heart failure: the STRONG-HF trial

Eur Heart JPublished

  • Secondary analysis of the STRONG-HF randomised trial

Authors' conclusion

Among patients with acute HF enrolled in STRONG-HF, HIC reduced 180-day HF readmission or death regardless of baseline NT-proBNP. GRMT up-titration early post-discharge, utilizing increased NT-proBNP as guidance to increase diuretic therapy and reduce the GRMT up-titration rate, resulted in the same 180-day outcomes regardless of early post-discharge NT-proBNP change.

Study context

Population
Patients hospitalized for acute heart failure (HF) with >10% NT-proBNP decrease from screening (admission) to randomization (pre-discharge)
Participants
1,077 patients
Comparison
Decreased NT-proBNP vs Stable NT-proBNP vs Increased NT-proBNP
Primary endpoint
HF readmission or death
Follow-up
180 days

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

180-day HF readmission or death

High intensity care (HIC), increased vs decreased NT-proBNP (randomization to 1 week): no difference in outcome at 180 days, 13.5% vs. 13.2%

P = 0.93

Further findings

OutcomeDecreased NT-proBNPStable NT-proBNPIncreased NT-proBNPP value
180-day HF readmission or death at 60 days, HIC by NT-proBNP change2.2%Not reported in the abstract8.3%P = 0.039
180-day HF readmission or death at 90 days, HIC by NT-proBNP change4.0%Not reported in the abstract11.1%P = 0.045

Optimal guideline-recommended medical therapy (GRMT) doses reached, HIC by NT-proBNP change · 6 months

Increased NT-proBNP reached 70.4% optimal GRMT doses, compared with 80.3% for those with NT-proBNP decrease
Increased NT-proBNP: more diuretics and slower up-titration in the first weeks after discharge (per protocol)

Original publication

NT-proBNP and high intensity care for acute heart failure: the STRONG-HF trial. Eur Heart J. Published 22 May 2023. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad335

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it