Heart failure & cardiomyopathiesSecondary analysis

On-Treatment Analysis of Torsemide Versus Furosemide for Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure: A Post-Hoc Analysis of TRANSFORM-HF

Eur J Heart FailPublished

  • Secondary analysis of the TRANSFORM-HF randomised trial
  • post-hoc
  • on-treatment analysis
  • open-label
  • pragmatic

Authors' conclusion

In TRANSFORM-HF, a post-hoc on-treatment analysis did not meaningfully differ from the original trial results.

Study context

Population
Patients hospitalized for heart failure (HF) (June 2018–March 2022), excluding those confirmed non-adherent to study diuretic2,570 on-treatment at discharge
Participants
2,859 patients
Comparison
Torsemide vs furosemide
Primary endpoint
All-cause mortality
Follow-up
12 months

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

Torsemide vs FurosemideHazard ratio (95% CI)P value
on-treatment at discharge: 17.5% vs 17.8%
1.01(0.83–1.22)
P = 0.96
on-treatment at 30-day follow-up: 14.5% vs 15.0%
1.02(0.81–1.27)
P = 0.90

Further findings

OutcomeTorsemideFurosemideEstimateP value
All-cause mortality or all-cause hospitalization · 12 months · on-treatment at discharge58.3%61.3%HR 0.92 (95% CI 0.82–1.03)
All-cause mortality or all-cause hospitalization · 12 months · on-treatment at 30-day follow-up60.9%64.4%HR 0.93 (95% CI 0.82–1.05)
Total hospitalizations (on-treatment at 30-day follow-up) · 12 months677 events686 eventsrate ratio 0.99 (95% CI 0.86–1.14)P = 0.87

Original publication

On-Treatment Analysis of Torsemide Versus Furosemide for Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure: A Post-Hoc Analysis of TRANSFORM-HF. Eur J Heart Fail. Published 15 May 2024. doi:10.1002/ejhf.3293

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it