Coronary disease & ACS

Optical coherence tomography versus angiographic guidance in true unprotected left main bifurcation disease: an OCTOBER substudy

EuroInterventionPublished OCTOBER substudy

Primary result · MACE (cardiac death, any myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularisation)Result — go to the resultHazard ratio 0.78 95% CI 0.39–1.51

Authors' conclusion

OCT-guided PCI in true LMCA bifurcation lesions was clinically feasible, but visibility of the LMCA ostium was limited by short pullbacks, insufficient clearance, or guide catheter shadowing. OCT guidance was associated with a non-significant reduction in MACE, consistent with the effect estimate in the main trial.

Study context

Population
Patients with true unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) bifurcation lesions undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)patients included
Participants
227 patients
Comparison
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) guidance compared with angiographic guidance in PCI of true LMCA bifurcation lesions
  • OCTn = 111
  • Angiographyn = 116reference
Methodological detailsrandomised to either OCT or angiographic guidance in the OCTOBER Trial
  • Randomised to either OCT or angiographic guidance in the OCTOBER Trial

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

Major adverse cardiac events (MACE):
  • Cardiac death
  • Any myocardial infarction
  • Target lesion revascularisation

Hazard ratio

0.78

95% CI 0.39–1.51

By group

OCTvs angiography
hazard ratio 0.78 (95% CI 0.39–1.51)

Further findings

Feasibility of OCT guidance (successful pullbacks, as per protocol)

Pre-stenting pullback performed
98%
Final pullback performed
96%

Analysability of the proximal LMCA stent edge

Proximal LMCA stent edge analysable
43%
Not analysable
57%
Of the remaining 57% (not analysable), limited by insufficient image quality
5%

Original publication

Optical coherence tomography versus angiographic guidance in true unprotected left main bifurcation disease: an OCTOBER substudy. EuroIntervention. Published 15 May 2026. doi:10.4244/eij-d-25-01337

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.