Prevention & lipidsRandomised controlled trial

Oral Muvalaplin for Lowering of Lipoprotein(a)

JAMAPublished

  • Randomised controlled trial
  • phase 2
  • placebo-controlled
  • double-blind
  • 43 sites

Authors' conclusion

Muvalaplin reduced lipoprotein(a) measured using intact lipoprotein(a) and apolipoprotein(a)-based assays and was well tolerated.

Study context

Population
Lipoprotein(a) ≥175 nmol/L with atherosclerotic CVD, DM or familial hypercholesterolemia; 43 sites in Asia, Europe, Australia, Brazil and the US, 2022–2023
Participants
233 participants
Comparison
Oral muvalaplin vs placebo
  • 10 mg/dn = 34
  • 60 mg/dn = 64
  • 240 mg/dn = 68
  • Placebon = 67reference
Primary endpoint
Placebo-adjusted percentage change from baseline in lipoprotein(a) molar concentration (intact lipoprotein(a) assay and apolipoprotein(a)-based assay)
Follow-up
Week 12

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

Placebo-adjusted reduction in lipoprotein(a)
Each group vs placeboPlacebo-adjusted reduction, % (95% CI)
10 mg/dintact lipoprotein(a) assay
47.6(35.1%–57.7%)
60 mg/dintact lipoprotein(a) assay
81.7(78.1%–84.6%)
240 mg/dintact lipoprotein(a) assay
85.8(83.1%–88.0%)
10 mg/dapolipoprotein(a)-based assay
40.4(28.3%–50.5%)
60 mg/dapolipoprotein(a)-based assay
70.0(65.0%–74.2%)
240 mg/dapolipoprotein(a)-based assay
68.9(63.8%–73.3%)

Secondary outcomes

Outcomereduction (%) (95% CI)
Apolipoprotein B (reduction) — 10 mg/d vs Placebo · dose-dependent8.9 (−2.2% to 18.8%)
Apolipoprotein B (reduction) — 60 mg/d vs Placebo · dose-dependent13.1 (4.4%–20.9%)
Apolipoprotein B (reduction) — 240 mg/d vs Placebo · dose-dependent16.1 (7.8%–23.7%)

High-sensitivity C-reactive protein

No change in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein

Safety

Safety and tolerability

No safety or tolerability concerns at any dosage

Original publication

Oral Muvalaplin for Lowering of Lipoprotein(a). JAMA. Published 21 January 2025. doi:10.1001/jama.2024.24017

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it