Arrhythmias & electrophysiology

Performance of cardiac implantable electronic devices in detecting premature ventricular contraction burden

Heart RhythmPublished Retrospective cohort study

Authors' conclusion

CIEDs underestimate PVC burden compared with ambulatory cardiac monitoring.

Study context

Population
Adults with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) undergoing concurrent ambulatory cardiac monitoring, Vanderbilt University Medical Center571 concurrent monitoring instances
Participants
439 adults
Exposure
CIED vs ambulatory cardiac monitoring for PVC burden
Outcome
PVC burden quantified by CIED vs ambulatory monitoring
Methodological detailssingle-centre
  • Single-centre

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

PVC burden
Probability of CIED detecting burden ≥15% when ambulatory monitor detects ≥15%
≈11%

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Original publication

Performance of cardiac implantable electronic devices in detecting premature ventricular contraction burden. Heart Rhythm. Published 28 May 2025. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.05.006

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.