Coronary disease & ACS

Platelet inhibition with orodispersible ticagrelor in acute coronary syndromes according to morphine use: the TASTER study final results

Eur Heart J Cardiovasc PharmacotherPublished Randomised controlled trial

Authors' conclusion

There was no difference between ODT and standard ticagrelor tablets in terms of post-LD residual platelet reactivity, percentage of platelet inhibition or safety regardless to morphine use.

Study context

Population
Patients with STEMI or very high-risk NSTE-ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), by morphine userandomised
Participants
One-hundred and 30 patients
Comparison
Orodispersible ticagrelor vs standard coated tablet ticagrelor 180 mg loading dose (LD)
Primary endpoint
Residual platelet reactivity (PRU, VerifyNow) across the two ticagrelor formulations and by morphine use
Follow-up
1 h after LD
Methodological detailsstratified randomisation by morphine use
  • Stratified randomisation by morphine use

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

1-h PRU, by morphine use

Further findings

1-h PRU, morphine vs no morphine · 1 h after LD · morphine n = 32; no morphine n = 98

P = 0.012

Platelet reactivity at 2, 4 and 6 h · 2, 4 and 6 h after LD

Similar in the 2 study arms

Safety

In-hospital adverse events or drug side-effects, with vs without morphine

Reinfarction due to acute stent thrombosis in a morphine-treated patient
1
No significant difference

Original publication

Platelet inhibition with orodispersible ticagrelor in acute coronary syndromes according to morphine use: the TASTER study final results. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. Published 17 August 2023. doi:10.1093/ehjcvp/pvad061

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.