Arrhythmias & electrophysiologyCross-sectional study

Practice patterns for anticoagulation monitoring after successful typical flutter ablation and related outcomes: An ITHACA-Database study

Heart RhythmPublished

  • contemporary cross-sectional analysis

Authors' conclusion

This 5.4-year real-world analysis reveals that most clinicians continue AC after tAFL ablation despite its 2B indication. ILRs offer an alternative and more effective method for monitoring patients who discontinue AC. AF was asymptomatic in most patients; however, it was found in most patients who experienced a stroke, 55.6% of whom were maintained on AC at the time of the event.

Study context

Population
Patients undergoing typical atrial flutter (tAFL) ablation without a history of atrial fibrillation (AF) at Northwell Health from 2015 to 2024, identified in the Investigational NorTHwell Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation-databasepatients who underwent tAFL ablation
Participants
1,236 patients
Exposure
standard of care vs implantable pacing device vs implantable loop recorder (ILR)

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

AF diagnosed after tAFL ablation · median of 2.2 years

Diagnosed with AF

36.4% (451/1236)

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Monitoring strategy

Outcomestandard of careimplantable pacing deviceimplantable loop recorder (ILR)
AF detection with ILR
AF detection rateNot reported in the abstractNot reported in the abstract55.2%
time to diagnosisNot reported in the abstractNot reported in the abstract19 months
Monitoring strategy — CHA2DS2-VASc ≥3 more likely to have ILR
27%

Anticoagulation (AC) continued after tAFl

AC continued
63.0%
CHA2DS2-VASc ≥3 more likely to continue AC
32%

Safety

Stroke

Strokes occurred in patients
18,1.5%
CHA2DS2-VASc of those with stroke
4.3
of those with stroke, on AC
55.6%
of those with stroke, diagnosed with AF
72.2%

Original publication

Practice patterns for anticoagulation monitoring after successful typical flutter ablation and related outcomes: An ITHACA-Database study. Heart Rhythm. Published 15 April 2026. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2026.04.005

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it