Acute cardiac care & resuscitationResearch article
Pragmatic Assessment of Venoarterial-extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VA-ECMO) Decannulation Readiness After Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
- Consecutive OHCA patients treated under the Minnesota Resuscitation Consortium extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) protocol from December 2015 to March 2023 were analyzed
- Bayesian additive regression trees
- multivariable logistic regression
Authors' conclusion
Our study identifies several pragmatic variables, noninvasive and accessible at the bedside that are predictive of successful decannulation among OHCA patients undergoing ECPR. Prospective validation of a composite decannulation prediction score incorporating these variables is warranted to aid decision-making.
Study context
- Population
- OHCA patients treated with ECPR under the Minnesota Resuscitation Consortium ECPR protocol, December 2015 to March 2023OHCA ECPR patients, 125 underwent VA-ECMO decannulation
- Participants
- 390 patients
- Comparison
- Hemodynamic, vasoactive medication, echocardiographic, and mechanical circulatory support variables were compared between successful and failed decannulation
- successful decannulationn = 110
Main finding
As reported in the abstract
Successful, of the 125 who underwent VA-ECMO decannulation
110 (88%)
Further findings
Witnessed arrest
Bystander CPR
Variables associated with decannulation success on weaning readiness assessment
| Comparison | OR (95% CI) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| left ventricular ejection fraction at lowest VA-ECMO flow · associated with decannulation success | 0.96 (0.92–0.99) | P = 0.024 | |
| arterial pulsatility · associated with decannulation success | 0.95 (0.90–0.99) | P = 0.027 | |
| Vasoactive inotrope score · associated with decannulation success | 1.16 (1.04–1.32) | P = 0.013 | |
| days on VA-ECMO support · associated with decannulation success | 1.40 (1.13–1.79) | P = 0.003 | |
| 0.512Odds ratio (log scale) |
- Witnessed arrest: P = 0.04
- Bystander CPR: P = 0.05
Prediction of decannulation success by Bayesian additive regression trees model (left ventricular ejection fraction, pulsatility, vasoactive-inotrope score, predecannulation VA-ECMO flow, concomitant intra-aortic balloon pump support)
- area under the curve
- 0.91
Original publication
Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it