Valvular & structural heart diseaseCohort study

Pregnancy with a prosthetic heart valve, thrombosis, and bleeding: the ESC EORP Registry of Pregnancy and Cardiac disease III

Eur Heart JPublished

  • Prospective registry study
  • global registry

Authors' conclusion

More favourable outcomes were found in women with a biological valve compared with a mechanical valve.

Study context

Population
Pregnancies in women with a prosthetic heart valve, January 2018 to April 2023
Participants
613 pregnancies
Exposure
Mechanical vs biological prosthetic heart valve in pregnancy
  • Mechanical valven = 411
  • Biological valven = 202reference
Outcome
Uncomplicated pregnancy with a live birth

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

P < 0.001

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Thromboembolic event by anti-Xa monitoring

P = 0.060

Foetal death

Foetal death, all pregnancies
20%

Safety

OutcomeOR (95% CI)
Valve thrombosis · association with valve thrombosis3.3 (1.9–8.0)
Valve thrombosis — Valve thrombosis, women
24 (6%)

Valve thrombosis

Thromboembolic and haemorrhagic complications most frequent with low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH)-based regimens

Original publication

Pregnancy with a prosthetic heart valve, thrombosis, and bleeding: the ESC EORP Registry of Pregnancy and Cardiac disease III. Eur Heart J. Published 16 April 2025. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf265

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it