Prevention & lipidsMeta-analysis

Prehabilitation in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Procedures

JACC AdvPublished

  • meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models
  • Trials were screened by 2 reviewers

Authors' conclusion

Prehabilitation before cardiac procedures may enhance preprocedural functional capacity and postprocedural recovery, particularly in women. Further multicenter studies are needed.

Study context

Population
Cardiac patients undergoing cardiac procedures, in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing prehabilitation with standard care up to August 2024patients in 44 RCTs
Participants
3,925 patients
Comparison
prehabilitation with standard care in cardiac patients

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

6-minute walk distance (preprocedural functional capacity)

MD

68.87 m

95% CI 12.76–124.98

P = 0.020

prehabilitation vs standard care
MD 68.87 m (95% CI 12.76–124.98); P = 0.020

Further pooled results

OutcomeMD (days) (95% CI)P value
Length of stay · 18 studies (n = 1,568); length of stay was shorter−0.95 (−1.77 to −0.13)P = 0.026
OutcomeMD (hours) (95% CI)P value
Intensive care unit stay · 16 trials (n = 1,149); intensive care unit stay was reduced−6.03 (−12.01 to −0.06)P = 0.048
OutcomeOR (95% CI)P value
Postprocedural pneumonia · 5 studies (n = 729); occurred less frequently0.33 (0.15–0.72)P = 0.017
  • Length of stay: meta-regression showed greater effect in studies including more women (P = 0.015)

Heterogeneity and risk of bias

The analysis revealed substantial heterogeneity and risk of bias

Specific components

Analysis of specific components showed no consistent effects

Original publication

Prehabilitation in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Procedures. JACC Adv. Published 29 January 2026. doi:10.1016/j.jacadv.2026.102587

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it