Arrhythmias & electrophysiologyMeta-analysis

Prevalence of asymptomatic atrial fibrillation and risk factors associated with asymptomatic status: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Eur J Prev CardiolPublished

  • Systematic review and meta-analysis
  • random-effects meta-analysis
  • double-independent study selection

Authors' conclusion

Asymptomatic AF was estimated around 27%, with large variability depending on the prevalence of risk factors associated with asymptomatic status. Asymptomatic individuals had distinct characteristics compared to symptomatic patients, regardless of symptoms' assessment methods and rhythm/rate control interventions.

Study context

Population
Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF)
Participants
224,273 patients · 37 studies
Comparison
Asymptomatic vs symptomatic AF
Outcome
Prevalence of asymptomatic AF and risk factors associated with asymptomatic status

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

Prevalence of asymptomatic AF; risk factors associated with asymptomatic status

Prevalence of asymptomatic AF

27%

Parts of this Brief are withheld: the automatic checks could not confirm them against the abstract.

Original publication

Prevalence of asymptomatic atrial fibrillation and risk factors associated with asymptomatic status: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Prev Cardiol. Published 7 March 2025. doi:10.1093/eurjpc/zwaf138

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it