Valvular & structural heart diseaseCohort study
Prognostic Implications of RV-Arterial Coupling Estimated by CMR in a Large Cohort of Tricuspid Regurgitation Patients
- cohort
Authors' conclusion
In this large cohort of patients with a wide spectrum of TR severity, right ventricular-pulmonary arterial coupling assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance was strongly associated with right-sided heart failure and worse long-term prognosis, even after comprehensive adjustment.
Study context
- Population
- Patients referred for cardiac magnetic resonance from 2019 to 2024 who had tricuspid regurgitation (TR) quantification, with a spectrum of TR severity, under medical managementpatients included
- Participants
- 631 patients
- Exposure
- Low vs higher forward right ventricular stroke volume (f-RVSV)/end-systolic volume (ESV) ratio
Main finding
As reported in the abstract
- median age
- 66 (interquartile range [IQR], 54-75) years
- median tricuspid regurgitant volume
- 18 (IQR, 12-30 mL)
- median left ventricular ejection fraction
- 53 (IQR, 41-61)%
- median RV ejection fraction
- 53 (IQR, 45-58)%
- median f-RVSV/ESV ratio
- 0.82 (IQR, 0.58-1.11)
Observational data: associations, not effects.
Further findings
Composite of all-cause death and heart failure hospitalization
| Comparison | adjusted hazard ratio (95% CI) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| f-RVSV/ESV ≤0.57 | 2.36 (1.27–4.37) | P = 0.004 | |
| 0.20.5125Adjusted hazard ratio (log scale) |
- Composite of all-cause death and heart failure hospitalization: after comprehensive adjustment for clinical and imaging confounders
f-RVSV/ESV ratio cutoff associated with a hazard >1 for the composite outcome (restricted spline curve analysis)
- cutoff
- ≤0.57
Signs of right heart failure, TRI-SCORE and right-sided chamber remodeling at baseline
- low f-RVSV/ESV ratio strongly associated with subjective and objective signs of right heart failure, higher TRI-SCORE, and worse right-sided chamber remodeling
- all P <0.001
Survival · median follow-up of 1.8 years (IQR, 1.5-2.0)
- patients with a low f-RVSV/ESV ratio showed worse survival
- P < 0.001
Long-term prognosis by TR severity
- low f-RVSV/ESV worse prognosis, mild TR
- P < 0.001
- low f-RVSV/ESV worse prognosis, moderate TR
- P < 0.001
- low f-RVSV/ESV worse prognosis, severe TR
- P = 0.018
Original publication
Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it