Arrhythmias & electrophysiology

Pulsed-Field Ablation of Atrial Flutter: Insights From a Large Volume U.S. Center

JACC Clin ElectrophysiolPublished Prospective cohort study

Authors' conclusion

PFA is a safe and effective modality for AFL ablation, achieving high acute success rates and favorable safety outcomes.

Study context

Population
Patients undergoing pulsed-field ablation (PFA) of atrial flutter (AFL) across subtypes
Participants
311 patients368 AFLs
Outcome
Acute procedural success (AFL termination or bidirectional block across ablation lines)
Methodological detailsconsecutive patients, intracardiac echocardiography guidance
  • Consecutive patients
  • Intracardiac echocardiography guidance

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Acute procedural success with PFA alone

Acute procedural success, PFA alone

96.5%

95% CI 94.03%–98.11%

Cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent flutters

99.5%

95% CI 97.34%–99.99%

Perimitral circuits

85.4%

95% CI 75.83%–92.20%

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Adjunctive radiofrequency ablation required (circuits, predominantly perimitral AFLs)

Circuits requiring adjunctive radiofrequency ablation
3.5%

AFL recurrence (after 90-day blanking) · median follow-up 175 days (Q1-Q3: 132-244 days)

Recurrence, flutters
14 (3.9%; 95% CI: 2.17%-6.53%)
Success rate, cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent flutters
98.5%
Success rate, perimitral AFLs
90%

Safety

Freedom from procedure-related adverse events
99% (95% CI: 97.21%-99.80%)

Original publication

Pulsed-Field Ablation of Atrial Flutter: Insights From a Large Volume U.S. Center. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. Published 13 August 2025. doi:10.1016/j.jacep.2025.06.036

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.