Coronary disease & ACS

Quantitative flow ratio as a continuous predictor of myocardial infarction

EuroInterventionPublished Pooled per-vessel analysis of the FAVOR III China and PANDA-III randomised trials

Authors' conclusion

The present study demonstrated a continuous, inverse relationship between the QFR value of a vessel and its subsequent risk for MI, and PCI, compared to medical therapy, reduced this risk beginning at a QFR value of 0.64.

Study context

Population
Vessels with reference diameter ≥2.5 mm and ≥1 lesion with diameter stenosis 50–90% in the FAVOR III China and PANDA-III trials5,564 + 4,471 vessels
Comparison
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs medical therapy, by quantitative flow ratio (QFR)
Outcome
MI, by QFR as a continuous variable and vessel treatment (interaction)
Follow-up
2 years
Methodological detailsoffline QFR
  • Offline QFR

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

MI

Net benefit of PCI over medical therapy for total myocardial infarction (MI) beginning at QFR

≤0.64

Further pooled results

Spontaneous MI, continuous QFR

ComparisonHR (95% CI)P value
Continuous QFRInverse association0.89 (0.79–0.99)P = 0.04
OutcomeHR (95% CI)P value
Spontaneous MI, continuous QFRPCI vs Medical therapy · association reduced by PCI0.26 (0.17–0.40)P < 0.0001

Original publication

Quantitative flow ratio as a continuous predictor of myocardial infarction. EuroIntervention. Published 7 August 2023. doi:10.4244/eij-d-23-00026

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.