Valvular & structural heart diseaseCohort study

Quantitative Identification of High-Risk Tricuspid Regurgitation by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance

CirculationPublished

  • Retrospective cohort study
  • observational

Authors' conclusion

In this large cohort, CMR provided several markers of high risk among patients with TR, with TRF thresholds considered by current guidelines as "moderate" TR already associated with worse long-term prognosis.

Study context

Population
Patients with tricuspid regurgitation (TR) referred to clinical cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), 2019–2024, with TR quantification (tricuspid regurgitant fraction (TRF)) and liver mapping (liver extracellular volume (L-ECV))371 with liver mapping data
Participants
489 patients
Exposure
TRF severity categories by CMR
Outcome
All-cause mortality and HF hospitalization under medical management, accounting for timing of tricuspid intervention
Follow-up
Median 2.3 years

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Survival free from both outcomes inversely associated with increasing TRF severity

P<0.001

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Secondary outcomes

OutcomeP value
TRF ≥20% with L-ECV ≥32% vs TRF ≥20% with L-ECV <32% — TRF ≥20% and L-ECV ≥32% vs TRF ≥20% and L-ECV <32% · primary outcome; highest adverse event rateP < 0.001
TRF ≥20% with L-ECV ≥32% vs TRF ≥20% with L-ECV <32% — TRF ≥20% and L-ECV ≥32% vs TRF ≥20% and L-ECV <32% · secondary outcome (all-cause mortality)P = 0.012

Baseline TRF

Median TRF 21% (IQR 14%-33%)

L-ECV ≥32% (liver mapping subset)

L-ECV ≥32% associated with right-sided HF manifestations and long-term adverse outcomes, incremental prognostic value
all P<0.001
  • 371 with liver mapping data

Original publication

Quantitative Identification of High-Risk Tricuspid Regurgitation by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance. Circulation. Published 12 November 2025. doi:10.1161/circulationaha.125.074862

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it