Coronary disease & ACSRandomised controlled trial

Radiation Exposure to Operators in Coronary Procedures Between Left Distal and Right Conventional Radial Access

JACC Cardiovasc IntervPublished

  • Randomised controlled trial
  • prospective
  • multicentre
  • open-label

Authors' conclusion

During coronary procedures, no significant differences were observed in the operator radiation exposure at the left wrist, head, and chest between the left DRA and right TRA groups.

Study context

Population
Patients scheduled for coronary procedures1,001 analysed
Participants
1,010 patients
Comparison
Left distal radial access vs right transradial access
  • Left distal radial access (DRA)n = 501
  • Right transradial access (TRA)n = 500reference
Primary endpoint
Operator radiation exposure (real-time dosimeters on left wrist, head and chest)

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

Operator radiation exposure
GroupLeft wristHeadChest
Left DRA4.76 μSv2.00 μSv1.28 μSv
Right TRA5.20 μSv1.83 μSv1.07 μSv
  • Left DRA vs Right TRA: P = 0.342 — left wrist
  • Left DRA vs Right TRA: P = 0.416 — head
  • Left DRA vs Right TRA: P = 0.199 — chest

Secondary outcomes

Access-site crossover

Crossover, left DRA vs right TRA: not significantly different
6.6% vs 5.2%; P = 0.416

Total fluoroscopy time

Fluoroscopy time, left DRA vs right TRA: not significantly different
4.5 minutes vs 4.2 minutes; P = 0.673

Total procedure time

Procedure time, left DRA vs right TRA: not significantly different
16.0 minutes vs 15.0 minutes; P = 0.314

Total contrast volume

Contrast volume, left DRA vs right TRA: not significantly different
80.0 mL vs 80.0 mL; P = 0.222

Original publication

Radiation Exposure to Operators in Coronary Procedures Between Left Distal and Right Conventional Radial Access. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. Published 25 October 2025. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2025.10.028

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it