Coronary disease & ACS

Rationale and design of the TADCLOT trial: A double blind randomized controlled trial comparing twice a day clopidogrel vs ticagrelor in reducing major cardiac events in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention

Am Heart JPublished double-blind, randomized controlled trial

Study context

Population
STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), randomized following successful PCI when deemed suitable for dischargepatients planned to complete the trial
Participants
2,200 patients
Planned comparison
Ticagrelor over twice-daily clopidogrel in reducing major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)
Primary endpoint
rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, target lesion revascularization, or stroke
Follow-up
30 days following randomization
Methodological detailssuperiority trial, National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (NICVD), Karachi, Pakistan
  • Superiority trial
  • National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (NICVD), Karachi, Pakistan

No results yet. This paper sets out the design of a trial; its results are to come.

Further findings

Enrollment has reached
88%

Original publication

Rationale and design of the TADCLOT trial: A double blind randomized controlled trial comparing twice a day clopidogrel vs ticagrelor in reducing major cardiac events in patients with acute STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Am Heart J. Published 12 April 2025. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2025.03.021

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.