Heart failure & cardiomyopathies

Endovascular Ablation of the Greater Splanchnic Nerve in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: The REBALANCE-HF Randomized Clinical Trial

JAMA CardiolPublished Randomised controlled trial

Primary result · PCWP (legs-up and exercise)Result — go to the resultMean between-group difference −0.03 mm Hg 95% CI −2.5 to 2.5

Authors' conclusion

Results show that SAVM was safe and technically feasible, but it did not reduce exercise PCWP at 1 month or improve clinical outcomes at 12 months in a broad population of patients with HFpEF.

Study context

Population
Patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), LVEF ≥40% and invasively measured peak exercise pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) ≥25 mm Hg
Participants
90 patients
Comparison
SAVM vs Sham
  • SAVMn = 44
  • Shamn = 46reference
Primary endpoint
Reduction in legs-up and exercise PCWP
Follow-up
1 month
Methodological detailsphase 2, double-blind, 1:1, sham-controlled, multicentre, 15 centres (14 US, 1 Republic of Georgia)
  • Phase 2
  • Double-blind
  • 1:1
  • Sham-controlled
  • Multicentre
  • 15 centres (14 US, 1 Republic of Georgia)

Primary result

PCWP (legs-up and exercise)

Mean between-group difference

−0.03 mm Hg

95% CI −2.5 to 2.5

P = 0.95

SAVM vs Sham
mean between-group difference −0.03 mm Hg (95% CI −2.5 to 2.5); P = 0.95

As reported in the abstract

Secondary outcomes

Secondary efficacy end points (HF hospitalisations, exercise function, health status through 12 months; 1-month change in resting, legs-up and 20-W exercise PCWP)

No differences in the secondary efficacy end points

Safety

OutcomeSAVMShamDifference (95% CI)P value
Serious device- or procedure-related adverse events (primary safety end point) · 1 month6.8%2.2%4.6% (−6.1% to 15.4%)P = 0.36
Orthostatic hypotension11.4%6.5%4.9% (−9.2% to 18.8%)P = 0.48

Adverse events

No differences in adverse events between groups

Original publication

Endovascular Ablation of the Greater Splanchnic Nerve in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: The REBALANCE-HF Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiol. Published 1 December 2024. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2024.2612

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.