Acute cardiac care & resuscitationCohort study

Rescue-breathing versus chest compression-only bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation in non-cardiac out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a nationwide retrospective cohort study

ResuscitationPublished

  • retrospective nationwide cohort study

Authors' conclusion

Thirty-day mortality and unfavorable neurological outcomes were lower after RB-CPR than after CO-CPR for non-cardiac OHCA, particularly in pediatric patients. Although CO-CPR remains important in bystander CPR, rescue breathing may still have benefit, particularly in pediatric patients and those with cardiac arrest related to drowning or asphyxia.

Study context

Population
Japanese patients with non-cardiac out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in the All-Japan Utstein Registry, 2012–2023, who received bystander CPR with documented chest compressions
Participants
154,137 patients
Exposure
bystander-performed RB-CPR vs compression-only CPR (CO-CPR)
  • RB-CPRn = 20,124
  • CO-CPRn = 134,013reference

Main finding

30-day mortality · 30 days

Adjusted relative risk

0.98

95% CI 0.98–0.99

RB-CPR vs CO-CPR
adjusted RR 0.98 (95% CI 0.98–0.99)

As reported in the abstract

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Outcomeadjusted RR (95% CI)
30-day unfavorable neurological outcomes0.99 (0.99–0.99)

Both outcomes by age group (subgroup)

RB-CPR was associated with lower risks of both outcomes in pediatric patients but no clear differences were observed among adult or elderly patients

Associations by subgroup

Associations were strongest for pediatric patients and drowning-related arrests and modest in patients with asphyxia

Original publication

Rescue-breathing versus chest compression-only bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation in non-cardiac out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a nationwide retrospective cohort study. Resuscitation. Published 25 September 2026. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2026.111332

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it