Heart failure & cardiomyopathiesCohort study

Residual congestion at discharge assessed by bioelectrical impedance and its prognostic value in acute heart failure: a multi-centre, prospective registry study

ESC Heart FailPublished

  • multi-centre registry database
  • prospective registry study

Authors' conclusion

The EI and PA measured at discharge independently predicted short-term WHFs in patients with AHF. The suggested thresholds for identifying patients at high-risk of residual congestion were EI ≥ 0.4 and PA < 4.5°. As a non-invasive and accessible modality, BIA holds promise as a complementary tool to established biomarkers for evaluating congestion at discharge.

Study context

Population
Patients with acute heart failure (AHF), with oedema index (EI) and phase angle (PA) measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) at discharge360 (60%) male, median age 72.1 years
Participants
600 patients
Exposure
high-risk BIA group compared with normal BIA group

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

WHF (composite of heart failure (HF) readmission and all-cause mortality) · Within 180 days

patients experienced WHFs

63 patients (11%)

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

OutcomeValuesEstimateP value
EI and PA, univariate association with WHF · 90 and 180 days — EI vs normal BIA · 90 days, univariateOR 1.83 (95% CI 1.43–2.35)all P < .01
EI and PA, univariate association with WHF · 90 and 180 days — EI vs normal BIA · 180 days, univariateOR 1.76 (95% CI 1.44–2.14)all P < .01
EI and PA, univariate association with WHF · 90 and 180 days — PA vs normal BIA · 90 days, univariateOR 0.93 (95% CI 0.90–0.96)all P < .01
EI and PA, univariate association with WHF · 90 and 180 days — PA vs normal BIA · 180 days, univariateOR 0.94 (95% CI 0.91–0.96)all P < .01
Increased EI and decreased PA, independent association with WHFs · 90 and 180 days — Increased EI vs normal BIA · 90 daysaHR 1.71 (CI 1.26–2.31)all P < .01
Increased EI and decreased PA, independent association with WHFs · 90 and 180 days — Increased EI vs normal BIA · 180 daysaHR 1.64 (CI 1.30–2.07)all P < .01
Increased EI and decreased PA, independent association with WHFs · 90 and 180 days — decreased PA vs normal BIA · 90 daysaHR 0.91 (CI 0.86–0.96)all P < .01
Increased EI and decreased PA, independent association with WHFs · 90 and 180 days — decreased PA vs normal BIA · 180 daysaHR 0.92 (CI 0.89–0.97)all P < .01
WHFs, high-risk vs normal BIA group · 90 and 180 days — high-risk BIA group vs normal BIA · 90 daysaHR 6.79 (CI 1.71–26.93)all P < .05
WHFs, high-risk vs normal BIA group · 90 and 180 days — high-risk BIA group vs normal BIA · 180 daysaHR 3.43 (CI 1.41–8.32)all P < .05
OutcomeValuesEstimateP value
Prognostic thresholds for unfavourable outcomes (ROC analysis)EI ≥ 0.4 predictive value 75% · P P < .01 · sensitivity 83% · specificity 56% · PA < 4.5° predictive value 71% · P P < .01 · sensitivity 81% · specificity 54%

Original publication

Residual congestion at discharge assessed by bioelectrical impedance and its prognostic value in acute heart failure: a multi-centre, prospective registry study. ESC Heart Fail. Published 8 January 2026. doi:10.1093/eschf/xvaf019

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it