Acute cardiac care & resuscitation
Right ventricular free-wall strain-based risk stratification for temporary mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock
Main finding · Temporary MCS implantationResult — go to the resultOdds ratio 10.49 95% CI 3.72–29.59Authors' conclusion
Integration of RV FWLS with clinical parameters may improve early risk stratification in CS.
Study context
- Population
- Patients admitted with cardiogenic shock (CS) with transthoracic echocardiography within 24 h of CS diagnosis and prior to mechanical circulatory support (MCS) implantation, January 2023 to December 202531 (34%) required temporary MCS
- Participants
- Ninety-two patients
- Exposure
- Severe right ventricular (RV) FWLS impairment and temporary MCS use
- Outcome
- Temporary MCS implantation
- Follow-up
- During hospitalization
Main finding
Temporary MCS implantation
Odds ratio
10.49
95% CI 3.72–29.59
Severe RV FWLS impairment (<11%)
OR 10.49 (95% CI 3.72–29.59)
As reported in the abstract
Observational data: associations, not effects.
Secondary outcomes
Intensive care stay
- Severe RV FWLS vs comparator, intensive care stay
- 21 vs 8 days
- P = .003
Hospital stay
- Severe RV FWLS vs comparator, hospital stay
- 25 vs 14 days
- P = .003
Mortality
- Severe RV FWLS not linked to mortality
Discrimination for temporary MCS
- RV FWLS AUC
- 0.74
- RV FWLS with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score AUC
- 0.82
Classification and regression tree-derived algorithm (RV FWLS, SOFA score, LVEF)
- Overall accuracy
- 78%
- Specificity
- 95%
Original publication
Right ventricular free-wall strain-based risk stratification for temporary mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock. ESC Heart Fail. Published 27 April 2026. doi:10.
Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it