Pulmonary vascular disease & thromboembolismRandomised controlled trial

Rivaroxaban for 18 Months Versus 6 Months in Patients With Cancer and Acute Low-Risk Pulmonary Embolism: An Open-Label, Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial (ONCO Pulmonary Embolism (PE) Trial)

CirculationPublished

  • Randomised controlled trial
  • open-label
  • adjudicator-blinded
  • multicentre
  • 32 institutions in Japan

Authors' conclusion

In patients with cancer and acute low-risk PE of the simplified version of the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index score of 1, the 18-month rivaroxaban treatment was superior to the 6-month rivaroxaban treatment with respect to recurrent VTE events.

Study context

Population
Patients with cancer and acute low-risk PE (simplified PESI score 1)178 ITT
Participants
179 patients
Comparison
Rivaroxaban 18 months vs 6 months
  • 18-month rivaroxabann = 89
  • 6-month rivaroxabann = 89reference
Primary endpoint
Recurrent VTE
Follow-up
18 months

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

Odds ratio

0.25

95% CI 0.09–0.72

P = 0.01

Events by treatment group

18-month rivaroxaban vs 6-month rivaroxaban
OR 0.25 (95% CI 0.09–0.72); P = 0.01

Secondary outcomes

Recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) types (all 22 events)

Symptomatic recurrent VTE
5
Recurrent PE (2 main, 4 lobar)
11
Recurrent DVT (3 proximal)
11

Safety

Outcome18-month rivaroxaban6-month rivaroxabanOR (95% CI)P value
Major bleeding (ISTH), major secondary end point · 18 months7.8%5.6%1.43 (0.44–4.70)P = 0.55

Original publication

Rivaroxaban for 18 Months Versus 6 Months in Patients With Cancer and Acute Low-Risk Pulmonary Embolism: An Open-Label, Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial (ONCO PE Trial). Circulation. Published 18 November 2024. doi:10.1161/circulationaha.124.072758

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it