Arrhythmias & electrophysiologyCohort study

Safety and effectiveness of zero-fluoroscopy atrial fibrillation ablation in community hospitals vs tertiary centers

Heart RhythmPublished

  • retrospective analysis
  • propensity score matching

Authors' conclusion

Ablation of PAF at CHs with ZF is safe with a shorter DAB and decrease AF recurrences when compared with TH.

Study context

Population
Patients evaluated at 2 community hospitals undergoing zero-fluoroscopy pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal AF, ablated at a tertiary hospital (2015–2017) or at community hospitals (2017–2021)2 matched cohorts of 290 patients
Participants
290 patients
Exposure
Paroxysmal AF (PAF) ablation with zero-fluoroscopy (ZF) at community hospitals (CHs) vs TH

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Intraprocedural complications or transfers
  • No intraprocedural complications or transfers occurred

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

OutcomeValuesHR (95% CI)P value
AF recurrence predicted by DAB · 18 m — Longer DAB vs DAB <3 m2.63 (1.65–4.21)
AF recurrence predicted by DAB · 18 m — DAB = 6-9 m vs DAB <3 m3.13 (2.136–3.13)
AF recurrence predicted by DAB · 18 m — DAB >9 m vs DAB <3 m3.7 (2.30–3.75)
OutcomeValuesEstimateP value
AF recurrence · 12 m · lower with CHCH 17% · TH 29%P = 0.010
AF recurrence · 18 m · lower with CHCH 23% · TH 42%P = 0.05
Diagnosis-to-ablation time (DAB) · shorter with CHCH 6.1 ± 1.2 m · TH 12.4 ± 2.5 mP = 0.01
Same-day discharge · higher with CHCH 93% · TH 70%P = 0.010
Repeat ablation · higher in THTH 27% · CH 7%P = 0.01

AF recurrence · 24 m

AF recurrence was similar at 24 m
20%

Original publication

Safety and effectiveness of zero-fluoroscopy atrial fibrillation ablation in community hospitals vs tertiary centers. Heart Rhythm. Published 19 March 2026. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2026.03.1896

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it