Prevention & lipidsRandomised controlled trial

School-Based Cardiovascular Health Promotion in Adolescents

JAMA CardiolPublished

  • Cluster randomised controlled trial
  • 4-year
  • 24 secondary schools
  • Barcelona and Madrid, Spain

Authors' conclusion

Overall, the tested school-based health promotion strategies in this randomized clinical trial had a neutral effect on the CVH of the adolescents. Although there was evidence of a marginal beneficial effect at a point halfway through implementation in the LTI group, such a benefit was not noted at 4 years.

Study context

Population
Adolescents in the first grade of secondary school, Barcelona and Madrid, Spain, 2017–20211,326 enrolled
Participants
412 / 504 / 441
Comparison
School-based health promotion (SI! Program) over 4 or 2 school years vs standard curriculum
  • LTIn = 412
  • STIn = 504
  • Controln = 441reference
Primary endpoint
Between-group difference in change from baseline of overall cardiovascular health (CVH) score (AHA; 0-14 points, higher = healthier)
Follow-up
2 and 4 years

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

Difference in CVH score change
Each group vs controlDifference, points (95% CI)P value
LTI2 years
0.44(0.01–0.87)
P = 0.04
STI2 years
0.18(−0.25 to 0.61)
P = 0.39
LTI4 years
0.12(−0.19 to 0.43)
P = 0.42
STI4 years
0.13(−0.17 to 0.44)
P = 0.38

Further findings

Baseline overall CVH score

Safety

Adverse events

No adverse events were reported

Original publication

School-Based Cardiovascular Health Promotion in Adolescents. JAMA Cardiol. Published 1 September 2023. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2023.2231

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it