Heart failure & cardiomyopathies

Sex- and phenotype-specific prognostic implications of body mass index in acute heart failure

ESC Heart FailPublished Analysis of the Korean heart failure (HF) III registry

Authors' conclusion

The prognostic implications of BMI in AHF differ according to HF phenotype and sex. Lower BMI is a consistent adverse marker in HFrEF in both sexes and shows a borderline adverse association in women with HFpEF, whereas BMI is not prognostic in men with HFpEF. These findings highlight the importance of sex- and phenotype-specific interpretation of BMI in risk assessment.

Study context

Population
Patients hospitalized for acute heart failure (AHF) with available data, Korean HF III registryanalyzed, from the Korean HF III registry (n = 7351)
Participants
5,271 patients
Exposure
Body mass index (BMI) categories by HF phenotype and sex
Outcome
Composite of:
  • All-cause mortality
  • Heart transplantation
Follow-up
2-year
Methodological detailsmultivariable Cox proportional hazards models, Kaplan-Meier analyses, interaction terms for BMI, sex, and HF phenotype
  • Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models
  • Kaplan-Meier analyses
  • Interaction terms for BMI, sex, and HF phenotype

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Hazard ratio (95% CI)P value
Higher BMIwomen with HFrEF; multivariable; lower risk with higher BMI
0.66(0.45–0.96)
P = 0.032
Lower BMIwomen with HFpEF; multivariable; borderline association with higher risk
1.56(0.99–2.47)
P = 0.057

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Outcomes by BMI in HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF)

Lower BMI consistently associated with worse outcomes in both men and women

Outcomes by BMI in HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)

BMI prognostic in women but not in men; survival differed by BMI category in Kaplan-Meier analyses for all subgroups except men with HFpEF

Original publication

Sex- and phenotype-specific prognostic implications of body mass index in acute heart failure. ESC Heart Fail. Published 25 March 2026. doi:10.1093/eschf/xvag050

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.