Congenital heart diseaseSecondary analysis

Single-Ventricle Disease

J Am Coll CardiolPublished

  • Secondary analysis of the Single Ventricle Reconstruction (SVR) randomised trial
  • multi-institutional
  • hierarchically ranked composite endpoint
  • risk-adjusted ordinal logistic regression

Authors' conclusion

Few patients with single ventricles survive free of major morbidity. Although overall outcomes did not differ by shunt type, the observed interaction between shunt type and severity of tricuspid regurgitation highlights an important area for future investigation.

Study context

Population
SVR trial participants with single-ventricle disease
Participants
549 participants
Comparison
Right ventricle-to-pulmonary artery shunt (RVPAS) vs modified Blalock-Taussig-Thomas shunt
Primary endpoint
Hierarchically ranked composite endpoint (death, transplant, parent-reported adaptive function and QoL, RV function, major complications, hospital stay), ranked by worst outcome
Follow-up
16 years

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

Hierarchical composite by shunt type, by pre-Norwood tricuspid regurgitation
RVPAS vs Modified Blalock-Taussig-Thomas shuntOdds ratio (95% CI)P value
no or mild pre-Norwood TR: no difference
1.3(0.9–1.8)
P = 0.14
moderate or severe pre-Norwood TR: worse outcomes with RVPAS
0.4(0.2–0.9)
P = 0.03
Death or major morbidity, all participants
87% (480/549)

Further findings

OutcomeHR (95% CI)P value
Mortality, moderate or severe pre-Norwood TR (Cox sensitivity analysis) · increased mortality with RVPAS5.4 (2.2–13.1)P = 0.0002

Predictors of worse outcomes

Prematurity and site were significant independent predictors of worse outcomes

Original publication

Single-Ventricle Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. Published 11 March 2026. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2026.01.049

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it