Arrhythmias & electrophysiologyCohort study

Standardized Spark-Pattern Cut-Mode Electrosurgical Bailout Workflow for Difficult Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Lead Advancement: Procedural and Follow-Up Outcomes From a 15-Patient Case Series

Circ Arrhythm ElectrophysiolPublished

  • Case Series
  • retrospective
  • consecutive patients

Authors' conclusion

A standardized spark-pattern cut-mode bailout workflow provides a reproducible framework for difficult left bundle branch area pacing lead deployment. Progression markers should be distinguished from procedural success, and follow-up surveillance remains essential. Larger studies with longer follow-up and dedicated lead-integrity testing are required before general adoption.

Study context

Population
Patients undergoing standardized spark-pattern cut-mode electrosurgical bailout after conventional mechanical left bundle branch area pacing lead advancement failed
Participants
15 consecutive patients

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Procedural success of left bundle branch area pacing lead deployment

Spark-pattern cut-mode electrosurgical bailout

15/15

events

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

OutcomeValues
Progression markersSpark-pattern cut-mode electrosurgical bailout V1 terminal rightward progression 14/15 · jump 14/15 · split/discrete components 12/15

Spark-pattern cut-mode assistance activation

Target-site advancement attempts
50
Final target sites with activation
15
Cycles per patient
1.5±0.6
  • Conventional advancement failed in all included patients

Follow-up

Mean follow-up
400±170 days

Safety

OutcomeValues
Spark-associated premature ventricular complexesSpark-pattern cut-mode electrosurgical bailout 15/15 events

Spark-associated premature ventricular complexes

isolated and self-limited; no nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, sustained ventricular tachycardia, polymorphic ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation, defibrillation, or hemodynamic instability during the standardized workflow

Lead and structural complications during follow-up · Mean follow-up 400±170 days

no clinically documented lead malfunction, dislodgement, microdislodgement, loss requiring revision, septal perforation, ventricular septal defect, pericardial effusion, or reintervention

Original publication

Standardized Spark-Pattern Cut-Mode Electrosurgical Bailout Workflow for Difficult Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Lead Advancement: Procedural and Follow-Up Outcomes From a 15-Patient Case Series. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. Published 7 October 2026. doi:10.1161/circep.126.015435

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it