Heart failure & cardiomyopathiesCohort study

Status Exceptions and Misalignment of Medical Urgency in U.S. Pediatric Heart Transplantation

J Am Coll CardiolPublished

  • Retrospective cohort study
  • registry-based (OPTN)
  • mixed-effects Cox models

Authors' conclusion

Pediatric heart transplant candidates granted status exceptions have significantly lower medical urgency than those meeting standard criteria. Implementation of a national review board did not result in improved alignment between waitlist mortality and listing status.

Study context

Population
Pediatric heart transplant candidates listed March 2016 through March 2025, US OPTN data
Participants
6,026 candidates
Exposure
Status exception vs standard criteria
  • Exception recipientsn = 1,668
Outcome
Waitlist mortality (death or deterioration)

Main finding

Waitlist mortality

Hazard ratio

0.41

95% CI 0.31–0.55

P < 0.001

Exception recipients vs Standard criteria
HR 0.41 (95% CI 0.31–0.55); P < 0.001

As reported in the abstract

National Heart Review Board (NHRB) impact on this association nonsignificant
P = 0.62

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

OutcomeWith exceptionsWithout exceptions (hypothetical)
Concordance index for waitlist mortality, with vs without exceptions0.694 (95% CI 0.682–0.706)0.713 (95% CI 0.700–0.724)
Concordance index for waitlist mortality, with vs without exceptions — Concordance improved without exceptions
P < 0.001

Waitlist mortality within status 1A

Significant heterogeneity, exception recipients having the highest survival

Original publication

Status Exceptions and Misalignment of Medical Urgency in U.S. Pediatric Heart Transplantation. J Am Coll Cardiol. Published 4 March 2026. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2026.01.052

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it